The capitalization rate, or “cap rate”, is one of the foundational concepts for understanding and evaluating a real estate investment. It can be expressed simply as a ratio of the net operating income (NOI) to the fair market value or sale price of the property, typically calculated on an annual basis. Cap rates are widely reported on at the market and CRE asset class level, and investors will evaluate cap rate of a potential investment alongside cap rates of comparable assets in the same market.
Cap Rate = Net Operating Income / Current Market Value
The inverse of this ratio – the fair market value divided by annual cash flow – shows the payback period, i.e. how many years it would take for a property to “pay for itself”. For example, a property purchased for $1 million that generates an annual net operating income of $50,000 would have a cap rate of 5%, and would pay off in 20 years. In practice, of course, neither NOI nor market value of a property will remain constant, and thus the capitalization rate of any particular property will fluctuate over time.
Cap Rates Across Markets
The cap rate can provide a simple way to compare the performance of properties of a similar size in a similar location. However, prevailing cap rates vary substantially across markets for similar properties. A Class A office building in New York or Los Angeles will typically carry a much lower cap rate than a class A office building in Detroit or St. Louis. This is due to market demand and the inherent risk in the property. Premier markets like Los Angeles or New York exhibit stronger market fundamentals – availability of high-paying jobs, workforce educational attainment, and demographic trends – and thus more stable cash flow prospects and less vacancy risk. Therefore, investors in New York and Los Angeles are likely to accept lower cap rates for a similar property. Put differently, a higher cap rate for our hypothetical Class A office property in Detroit reflects the “risk premium” an investor requires to purchase the property.
Limits of Cap Rates
While cap rates provide a good snapshot of current performance of a property, they should not be used in isolation to assess the overall return potential of two properties. Even similar properties in the same location likely carry different prospects for future cashflow. While a property’s value may be estimated by the use of, or expressed in terms of, a certain cap rate, this does not imply that its value is caused by the cap rate.
Current (or “going-in”) cap rate also does not say anything about the return potential of an improved property. When considering a value-add investment investors will seek to understand the likely cap rate of the property once improved and stabilized, using market comparables.
Alternatives to Cap Rates
As discussed above, cap rates are a incomplete instrument of measure due to inexact nature of predicting future cash flows. It is prudent to diversify the diligence process by looking at other return metrics that help to provide a more complete picture of return potential. One good alternative measure is yield on cost (YOC) which works very similarly to cap rates.
The formula for yield on cost is market rent (the rent the property would receive if every unit was being rented at its full potential) divided by the total basis in the transaction (the total amount of money put into the deal). Therefore, YOC is a great alternative to cap rates in properties because there is no dependency on predicting future cash flows/occupancy in the property. Yield on cost can also be more useful when evaluating value-add investments, because it considers rental cash flow as a percentage of the total cost of the project, rather than just the purchase price.
Going-In vs. Going-Out Cap Rates
Real estate investment theses are predicated on an exit event, typically a sale. Projecting how net operating income will evolve between acquisition and sale of a property (during the “hold period”) and how prevailing market cap rates will move, is key to projecting proceeds from sale, and hence overall expected return. The expected sale price of an asset at the end of a hold period is often very sensitive to minute shifts in the going-out cap rate (otherwise known as the “terminal” cap rate or “reversion” cap rate). Hence, real estate investors take great care in forecasting this figure. It’s typically realistic to forecast a going-out cap rate equal to or higher than the going-in cap rate, all else being equal. This is because as buildings age, they usually become more risky and less able to sustain growing rents; this effect will be more pronounced the longer the hold – in other words, the more time elapses between the initial sale and the exit, where the going-out cap rate is forecasted.
Other factors in forecasting going-out cap rates
- Market growth: if the property’s market is expected to grow denser, more desirable, and/or more supply-constrained over the investment’s term, it is reasonable to forecast a lower exit cap rate, all else being equal.
- Tenant lease situation: if one or more legacy leases are set to expire midway through a term, investors are wise to consider how the property’s rental prospects as those leases expire.
Monetary Policy, Interest Rates, & Cap Rates
Industry watchers have theorized about a positive relationship between interest rates and cap rates. The theory holds that rising interest rates increase the cost of borrowing – and hence cost of capital – and cool off real estate markets, as fewer real estate investors will compete when assets go to market. Some investors also worry more generally about the dampening macroeconomic effect of rising rates. Specifically, rising rates boost incentive to save, correspondingly lowering marginal propensity to spend and tempering consumer activity – while dis-incentivizing job-creating investments. This presumed outcome would lower demand for commercial real estate assets, all else being equal, adversely impacting property values.
– Steve Kohm, President, Cushman Wakefield
– Steve Kohm, President, Cushman Wakefield
While this sounds reasonable, it ignores the true cause-and-effect of monetary policy: interest rates are increased in response to robust economic growth. In other words, the economic fundamentals in play at the macro level and at the market level generally carry stronger implications for cap rates than do marginal increases in the cost of capital.
The Bottom Line
Cap rate is a critical expression of both return potential and risk inherent in a real estate asset. A lower cap rate will indicate that the market regards it as a safer asset. Accordingly, a lower-cap rate asset will by definition offer less in rental income relative to its fair-market value. Lower cap rates are characteristic of primary markets with strong demand drivers, where competition among real estate investors is fierce.
Exit cap rate modeling is critical to sound real estate investment underwriting, and successful real estate investors will leverage robust data sets to assess prevailing cap rates among comparable assets when considering an investment.
Was this content useful?
We'd like to hear from you. Your feedback will help us provide new material that is useful to you.